Analysis of first-year university students' conceptual understanding of direct current electric circuits

Authors

  • Judyanto Sirait Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v15i1.10012

Keywords:

conceptual understanding, direct current, physics, learning difficulties

Abstract

The concept of direct current (DC) electricity is taught from elementary school through higher education. The concepts covered include electric current, voltage (potential difference), and electric circuits in series and parallel configurations. However, students often experience difficulties in understanding these concepts, and such misconceptions frequently persist into university education. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze first-year university students’ conceptual understanding of direct current electric circuits. A descriptive survey with qualitative explanation was employed to investigate students’ conceptions in depth, involving 107 participants. Students completed multiple-choice questions and were asked to provide written explanations for each selected answer. The analysis revealed that more than 50% of the students were unable to answer the questions correctly. Most students believed that a battery is a constant source of electric current. In addition, many students assumed that adding more batteries would always increase the voltage regardless of the battery configuration. Furthermore, students demonstrated difficulties in understanding the behaviour of bulbs in series and parallel circuits. These findings indicate that first-year university students hold significant misconceptions related to direct current electricity. Therefore, educators need to implement instructional approaches that effectively support students in constructing scientifically accurate concepts of DC electric circuits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Judyanto Sirait, Universitas Tanjungpura

Department of Physics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

References

Balta, N and Logman, P.S.W.M. (2022). Development of counterintuitive basic electric DC circuit test. Journal of Physics Education. 57, 045033.

Bauman, L.C., Hansen, B., Goodhew, L.M., and Robertson, A.D. (2024). Student conceptual resources for understanding electric circuit. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 20, 020128.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design (Fifth). SAGE Publication.

Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based physics education research in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 10, 020119.

Etkina, Planinsic, & Van Heuvelen. (2019). A college physics: Explore and apply (2nd ed.). Pearson.

Giancoli, D. C. 2001. Fisika Jilid 2 (5th ed.). Erlangga, Jakarta.

Grob, B., Ivanjek, L., Flegr, S., Glaesser, J., Kelava, A., and Burde, J P. (2026). Development and validation of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 22, 010105.

Hernandez, E., Campos, E., Barniol, P., and Zavala, G. (2025). Test of understanding of electric field, force, flux: a reliable multiple-choice assessmet tool. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 21, 010156.

Ivanjek, L., Morris, L., Schubatzky, T., Hopf, M., Burde, J P., Schutzenhofer, C A., Dopatka, L., Spatz., and Wilhelm, T. (2021). Development of a two-tier instrument on simple electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17, 020123.

Kokkonen, T., and Mantyla, T. (2018). Changes in university students’ explanation models of DC Circuits. Research in Science Education, 48: 753-775.

Li, J., and Singh, C. (2016). Students’ common difficulties and approaches while solving conceptual problems with non-identical light bulbs in series and parallel. European Journal of Physics. 37, 065708.

Lin, J W. (2017). A comparison of experienced and preservice elementary school teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge about electric circuits. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(3).

Liu, Z., Pan, S., Zhang, X., and Bao, L. (2022). Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of simple electric circuit. Physical Review Physics Education Reseach. 18, 020102.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (Fourth). John Wiley and Sons.

Musengimana, T., Yadav, L L., Uwamahoro, J., and Nizeyamana, G. (2025). Employing systematic problem-solving strategy to enhance five secondary school students’ conceptual understanding of direct current. Journal of Physics Education. 60, 045014.

Nie, Y., Xiao, Y., Fritchman, J. C., Liu, Q., Han, J., Xiong, J., and Bao, L. (2019). Teaching towards knowledge integration in learning force and motion. International Journal of Science Education, 41(16).

Robertson, A. D., Goodhew, L. M., Bauman, L. C., Alesandrini, A. T., and Heron, P. R. L. (2025). Developing and assessing research-based, resource-oriented instructional material: attending to conceptual resources in (ACORN) physics tutorial. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 21, 020138.

Xu, W., Liu, Q., Koenig, K., Fritchman, J., Han, J., Pan, S., and Ba, L. (2020). Assessment of knowledge integration in student learning of momentum. Physical Review Physics Education Research. 16, 010130.

Wang, C., and Wei B. (2024). Analysis of visual-based physics questions of the senior high school entrance examination in China. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20, 010112.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Sirait, J. (2026). Analysis of first-year university students’ conceptual understanding of direct current electric circuits. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains, 15(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v15i1.10012

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Judyanto Sirait

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

License and Copyright Agreement

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/saintek/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

Copyright

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.