Emerging EdTech media impact: Enhancing science learning engagement in junior high school

Authors

  • Dessy Setyowati Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Barat
  • Muhammad Aqmal Nurcahyo Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Barat
  • Novaria Nusantara Seameo Seamolec
  • Arie Susanty Seameo Seamolec
  • Hendra Wijaya SMKS Kristen Immanuel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v15i1.10614

Keywords:

Emerging EdTech, Student Engagement, Immersive Technology, Science Learning

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the impact of Emerging Educational Technology (Emerging EdTech) media on student engagement in science learning at junior secondary schools located in the rural–urban transitional area of Kubu Raya Regency. The study employed a quantitative approach using a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group design. The sample consisted of 205 seventh-grade students divided into an experimental group (utilizing Emerging EdTech media) and a control group (utilizing H5P interactive video). Student engagement data were collected through a questionnaire based on Keller’s ARCS motivational model and behavioral observation sheets. The results indicated that the mean engagement score of students in the experimental group reached 3.26, which was higher than that of the control group at 2.98. The Independent Samples T-Test yielded a significance value of 0.000 (ρ < 0.05), indicating a statistically significant difference between the two groups. These findings suggest that the integration of Emerging EdTech media can influence student engagement in science learning. The study recommends the provision of immersive technology-based digital hands-on experiences as a strategic approach to transforming science education in secondary schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dessy Setyowati, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Barat

Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Muhammad Aqmal Nurcahyo, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Kalimantan Barat

Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Novaria Nusantara, Seameo Seamolec

Seameo Seamolec

Arie Susanty, Seameo Seamolec

Seameo Seamolec

Hendra Wijaya, SMKS Kristen Immanuel

SMKS Kristen Immanuel

References

Aikenhead, G. S., & Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Science Education, 75(5), 583–600.

Amin, A. S. (2023). Teknologi dalam pendidikan: Dampaknya terhadap perkembangan kognitif dan emosional siswa. 1(1), 20–25.

Ayuningtias, M. D., Suyatna, A., Suyanto, E., & Nwineh, L. (2018). Development of LCDS-based interactive electronic school book on blackbody radiation as self-instructional materials for fostering students' critical thinking. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i2.2518

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.

Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311

Dunleavy, M., & Dede, C. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 735–745). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_59

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Keller, J. M. (1985). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Makransky, G., & Lilleholt, L. (2018). A structural equation modeling investigation of the emotional value of immersive virtual reality in education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1141–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9581-2

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning (CAMIL): A theoretical research-based model of learning in immersive virtual reality. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2

Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33, 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning: Prinsip-prinsip dan aplikasi (T. W. Utomo, Trans.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K–12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Purba, P. B., Ika, Simarmata, J., Lakat, S. L., Widiawati, D., & Ginting, E. B. (2025). Pendidikan di era digital: Tantangan bagi Generasi Z. Yayasan Kita Menulis.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 697–716.

Rohmah, L., Shahhilina, D. S., & Wijaya, D. P. (2025). Virtual reality sebagai media pembelajaran interaktif pada materi tata surya: Solusi edukasi modern di era Pendidikan 5.0. 1(2), 14–17.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Surani, D. (2019). Studi literatur: Peran teknologi pendidikan dalam Pendidikan 4.0. 2(1).

Sviridova, E., Yastrebova, E., & Bakirova, G. (2023). Immersive technologies as an innovative tool to increase academic success and motivation in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1192760

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Yunita, & Irawan, T. A. (2025). Effectiveness of interactive students media in enhancing students' science concept understanding, 6687–6697.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Setyowati, D., Nurcahyo, M. A., Nusantara, N., Susanty, A., & Wijaya, H. (2026). Emerging EdTech media impact: Enhancing science learning engagement in junior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains, 15(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v15i1.10614