Analysis of Conceptual Understanding Improvement Through Solar Cell Experiments in Scientific-Based Physics Learning

Authors

  • Boisandi Boisandi IKIP PGRI Pontianak
  • Anita Anita IKIP PGRI Pontianak
  • Aulia Aulia IKIP PGRI Pontianak
  • Fila Delfia IKIP PGRI Pontianak

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v12i2.10629

Keywords:

Solar cell, renewable energy, scientific-based learning, conceptual understanding, science process skills

Abstract

The global energy transition toward renewable sources has increased the urgency of integrating solar energy concepts into physics education. This study analyzes the effectiveness and characteristics of solar cell experiments in supporting scientific-based learning at the senior high school level. The research employed a quantitative pre-experimental design using a one-group pretest–posttest approach. The participants were 32 twelfth-grade students in Pontianak, Indonesia. Research instruments included a conceptual understanding test, scientific activity observation sheets, student response questionnaires, and inquiry-based experiment worksheets. Data were analyzed using mean scores, N-gain calculations, and percentage-based descriptive analysis. The results indicate a significant improvement in students’ conceptual understanding, with the average score increasing from 58 to 82 and an N-gain value of 0.57 in the moderate category. The highest improvement was observed in students’ understanding of the effect of light intensity on electrical power output. The implementation of scientific learning stages showed high percentages across all phases, particularly in the experimenting phase (94%). These findings suggest that solar cell experiments effectively enhance both conceptual understanding and science process skills. The study concludes that simple, measurable, and contextual solar cell experiments can integrate empirical measurement, data analysis, and scientific communication into a coherent learning sequence. The integration of photovoltaic experiments is recommended to strengthen energy literacy and scientific literacy in secondary physics education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Boisandi Boisandi, IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Physics Education Program

Anita Anita, IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Physics Education Program

Aulia Aulia, IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Physics Education Program

Fila Delfia, IKIP PGRI Pontianak

Physics Education Program

References

Atar, H., & Atar, B. (2012). Investigating the multilevel effects of several variables on Turkish students’ science achievements on TIMSS. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 11(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/12.11.115

Ayob, S. M., Tan, C. W., Ayop, R., & Daud, M. F. (2022). Implementation of photovoltaic academic service learning at school and its impact on student schools and student facilitators. ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 6(2), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.11113/ajee2022.6n2.103

Chien, S., Su, C., Chou, C., & Li, W. (2018). Visual observation and practical application of dye-sensitized solar cells in high school energy education. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(7), 1167–1172. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00484

Dai, D., Gerbino, K., & Daley, M. (2011). Inquiry-based learning in China: Do teachers practice what they preach, and why? Frontiers of Education in China, 6(1), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11516-011-0125-3

Ghiasi, M., Ghiasi, V., & Siano, P. (2025). Renewable energy integration into industrial and residential buildings: A study across urban, rural, and coastal areas. IET Renewable Power Generation, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.70108

Guo, L., Vengalil, M., Abdul, N. M. M., & Wang, K. (2021). Design and implementation of virtual laboratory for a microgrid with renewable energy sources. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22459

Herrera, R. S., Márquez, M., Mejías, A., Morueta, R. T., & Andújar, J. M. (2015). Exploring the usability of a remote laboratory for photovoltaic systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(29), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.205

Mohammed, S., & Amponsah, K. (2021). Teachers’ and educational administrators’ conceptions of inquiry: Do they promote or constrain inquiry-based science teaching in junior high schools? Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 10(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v10n3p58

Prihatiningtyas, S., & Putra, I. A. (2018). Efektivitas penggunaan alat peraga sederhana berbasis pendekatan sains teknologi masyarakat pada materi fluida statis. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v5i2.10988

Salasati, I. L., Suryatna, A., & Suhanda, H. (2022). Analisis indikator keterampilan proses sains yang dapat dikembangkan melalui LKS praktikum berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada topik titrasi asam-basa. Jurnal Riset dan Praktik Pendidikan Kimia, 10(1), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrppk.v10i1.52153

Yuliati, Y., & Saputra, D. S. (2019). Urgensi pendidikan STEM terhadap literasi sains mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 2(1), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.21070/picecrs.v2i1.2420

Yuniarti, L. (2023). Differentiating instruction in inquiry-based learning to assess science process skills. https://doi.org/10.46529/socioint.202330

Zimny, J., Bielik, S., Michalak, P., & Bojko, M. (2018). The laboratory stand for measurements and analysis of photovoltaic modules. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 55(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020720917750954

Downloads

Published

2023-12-10

How to Cite

Boisandi, B., Anita, A., Aulia, A., & Delfia, F. (2023). Analysis of Conceptual Understanding Improvement Through Solar Cell Experiments in Scientific-Based Physics Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika Dan Sains, 12(2), 411–415. https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v12i2.10629