Merancang asesmen fisika menggunakan Evidence-Centered Design (ECD) dan Three-Dimensional Learning Protocol (3D-LAP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v13i2.8228Keywords:
asesmen, gaya, ECD, 3D-LAPAbstract
Ada tiga komponen utama dalam sistem pendidikan yang saling berkaitan yaitu kurikulum, pengajaran, dan asesmen. Untuk mengukur ketercapaian hasil belajar siswa yang berkaitan dengan kompetensi terletak pada bagian asesmen. Untuk itu guru harus memiliki kemampuan yang baik untuk mendesain asesmen yang sesuai dengan capaian dan tujuan pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merancang asesmen fisika untuk tingkat SMA pada topik gaya berdasarkan kerangka berpikir evidence-centered design (ECD) dan three-dimensional learning assessment protocol (3D-LAP). Langkah-langkah penyusunan asesmen gaya dengan pendekatan ECD yaitu menulis capaian pembelajaran yang berisi kompetensi siswa, menulis daftar pengetahuan dan keterampilan yang harus dimiliki siswa untuk mencapai kompetensi, menuliskan bukti yang menunjukkan siswa mencapai kompetensi, dan menuliskan karakteristik pertanyaan yang akan dibuat. Kompetensi yang akan dicapai siswa pada asesmen gaya ini berdasarkan 3D-LAP meliputi menggunakan representasi, memberikan penjelasan dan argumen disertai bukti, dan mengevaluasi informasi. Asesmen gaya yang disusun telah divalidasi oleh ahli untuk memastikan kesesuaiannya dengan tujuan pembelajaran. Hasil validasi merekomendasikan asesmen gaya ini dapat digunakan dalam pembelajaran fisika. Asesmen ini diharapkan menjadi salah satu alternatif yang dapat digunakan guru fisika untuk mengukur kompetensi siswa tentang gaya.
Downloads
References
Al-Salmani, F., Johnson, J., & Thacker, B. (2023). Assessing thinking skills in free-response exam problems: Pandemic online and in-person. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 10131.
Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Kemdikbudristek. (2022). Capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah pada kurikulum merdeka.
Bennett, R. E. (2010). Cognitively Based Assessment of, for, and as Learning (CBAL): A preliminary theory of action for summative and formative assessment. Measurement, 8(2–3), 70–91.
Dodlek, D., Planinsic, G., & Etkina, E. (2024). How to help students learn: An investigation of how in- and pre-service physics teachers respond to students’ explanations. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(1), 10120.
Harris, C. J., Krajcik, J. S., Pellegrino, J. W., & DeBarger, A. H. (2019). Designing Knowledge-In-Use Assessments to Promote Deeper Learning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 38(2), 53–67.
Hung, C. S., & Wu, H. K. (2024). High school science teachers’ assessment literacy for inquiry-based science instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 46(7), 621–642.
Kaldaras, L., Akaeze, H., & Krajcik, J. (2021). A Methodology for Determining and Validating Latent Factor Dimensionality of Complex Multi-Factor Science Constructs Measuring Knowledge-In-Use. Educational Assessment, 26(4), 241–263.
Kaldaras, L., Akaeze, H. O., & Krajcik, J. (2023). Developing and validating an Next Generation Science Standards-aligned construct map for chemical bonding from the energy and force perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(7), 1689-1726.
Laverty, J. T., & Caballero, M. D. (2018). Analysis of the most common concept inventories in physics: What are we assessing? Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 10123.
Laverty, J. T., Underwood, S. M., Matz, R. L., Posey, L. A., Carmel, J. H., Caballero, M. D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Ebert-May, D., Jardeleza, S. E., & Cooper, M. M. (2016). Characterizing college science assessments: The three-dimensional learning assessment protocol. PLoS ONE, 11(9), 1–21.
Matejak Cvenic, K., Planinic, M., Susac, A., Ivanjek, L., Jelicic, K., & Hopf, M. (2022). Development and validation of the Conceptual Survey on Wave Optics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010103.
Osborne, J. F., Henderson, J. B., MacPherson, A., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821–846.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicologia Educativa, 20(2), 65–77.
Pellegrino, J. W., DiBello, L. V., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). A Framework for Conceptualizing and Evaluating the Validity of Instructionally Relevant Assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Wilson, M. (2015). Assessment of Complex Cognition: Commentary on the Design and Validation of Assessments. Theory into Practice, 54(3), 263–273.
Satria, R., Adiprima, P., Wulan, K, S., & Harjatanaya, T, Y. (2022). Panduan pengembangan proyek penguatan profil pelajar pancasila. Badan Standar Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kementrian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Scheid, J., Müller, A., Hettmannsperger, R., & Schnotz, W. (2019). Improving learners’ representational coherence ability with experiment-related representational activity tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010142
Sirait, J., Ainley, J., & Barstow, M. (2023). The pattern of physics education students’ diagrams and answers in solving force problems. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(2), 178–186.
Sirait, Judyanto. (2021). Multirepresentasi Dalam Penyelesaian Soal Fisika. Fahruna Bahagia.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Leadership Training Institute/Special Education University of Minnesota.
Wagner, S., & Priemer, B. (2023). Assessing the quality of scientific explanations with networks. International Journal of Science Education, 45(8), 636–660.
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Judyanto Sirait
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/saintek/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
