Human Rights Enforcement in the Post-Truth Era: Digital Discourse of #IndonesiaHumanRightsSOS on Twitter

Authors

  • Michael Angello Qadosy Riyadi Telkom University
  • A'isyah Belqis Febi Aulia
  • M. Asif Nur Fauzi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/jpkn.v10i1.10681

Keywords:

Human Rights Discourse, Digital Discourse Analysis, Twitter, Indonesia, Post-Truth Era

Abstract

The proliferation of social media has transformed how Human Rights (HR) issues are articulated, contested, and politicized within digital public spheres. This study examines the discourse surrounding the hashtag #IndonesiaHumanRightsSOS on Twitter in December 2020 as a public response to the alleged extrajudicial killing of six members of the Front Pembela Islam (FPI) by Indonesian police at KM50 of the Jakarta–Cikampek Toll Road. By analyzing 106,903 tweets from more than 45,000 accounts within a 72-hour period, this qualitative-descriptive study employs digital discourse analysis (DDA) to identify discourse forms, human rights enforcement challenges, and post-truth characteristics. The findings reveal the dominance of demands for justice and accountability, expressions of public solidarity, and condemnation of state actors. Key challenges include impunity, procedural injustice, institutional trust crisis, and politicization. This study contributes to the advancement of digital discourse analysis in the post-truth context in Indonesia and underscores the importance of strengthening critical digital literacy in Civic Education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, S. K., R. A. Mohammed, A. J. Nashwan, R. H. Ibrahim, A. Q. Abdalla, B. M. M. Ameen, and R. M. Khdhir. (2025). Using Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 6: 100198. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2025.100198.

Allen, J., A. A. Arechar, G. Pennycook, and D. G. Rand. (2021). Scaling up Fact-Checking Using the Wisdom of Crowds. Science Advances 7 (36): eabf4393. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf4393.

Altay, S., E. de Araujo, and A. Acerbi. (2022). Quantifying the Appetite for Misleading News: Demand-Side Evidence from a Representative Doorstep Survey. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 3 (2). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-104.

Cinelli, M., A. Pelicon, I. Mozetič, and et al. (2021). Dynamics of Online Hate and Misinformation. Scientific Reports 11 (1): 22083. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01487-w.

Ecker, U. K. H., S. Lewandowsky, J. Cook, P. Schmid, L. H. Fledderus, K. A. Hatch, and M. S. Zaragoza. (2022). The Psychological Drivers of Misinformation Belief and Its Resistance to Correction. Nature Reviews Psychology 1: 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y.

Freelon, D. (2021). Computational Research in the Post-API Age. Political Communication 38 (1–2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1722149.

González-Bailón, S., D. Lazer, P. Barberá, M. Zhang, B. Nyhan, J. Settle, and J. A. Tucker. (2023). Asymmetric Ideological Segregation in Exposure to Political News on Facebook. Science 381 (6656): 392–98. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade7138.

Hadiz, V. R. (2021). The ‘end of Liberalism’ and Southeast Asian Dysfunctional Democracies. The Pacific Review 34 (6): 1057–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1915965.

Hameleers, M. (2022). Separating the Wheat from the Chaff: A Conceptual, Experimental, and Meta-Analytic Review of the Research on Misinformation and Its Content-Related Correction. Social Media + Society 8 (2): 20563051221137604. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221137603.

Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Fourth Edition. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781.

Lewandowsky, S., and S. van der Linden. (2021). Countering Misinformation and Fake News through Inoculation and Prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology 32 (2): 348–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983.

Lim, M. (2021). Claiming the Public Sphere on Digital Platforms: Twitter and the Politics of Visibility in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Communication 31 (4): 259–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1896553.

Lorenz-Spreen, P., L. Oswald, S. Lewandowsky, and R. Hertwig. (2023). A Systematic Review of Worldwide Causal and Correlational Evidence on Digital Media and Democracy. Nature Human Behaviour 7: 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1.

Mietzner, M., and B. Muhtadi. (2022). The Populist Challenge to Liberal Democracy in Indonesia. Democratization 29 (4): 662–79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/-13510347.2021.2011754.

Noeyislearning. (2021). Twitter Data on IndonesiaHumanRightsSOS [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/noeyislearning/twitter-data-on-indonesiahumanrightssos.

Nyhan, B., J. Settle, E. Thorson, M. Wojcieszak, P. Barberá, A. Y. Chen, and J. A. Tucker. (2023). Like-Minded Sources on Facebook Are Prevalent but Not Polarizing. Nature 620 (7972): 137–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06297-w.

Pennycook, G., Z. Epstein, M. Mosleh, A. A. Arechar, D. Eckles, and D. G. Rand. (2021). Shifting Attention to Accuracy Can Reduce Misinformation Online. Nature 592: 590–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2.

Pennycook, G., and D. G. Rand. (2021). The Psychology of Fake News. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25 (5): 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007.

Roozenbeek, J., C. S. Traberg, and S. van der Linden. (2022). Techniques of Science Denial and Their Relationship to COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories. Royal Society Open Science 9 (3): 211412. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211412.

Zeng, J., and M. S. Schäfer. (2021). Conceptualizing ‘Dark Platforms’. Covid-19-Related Conspiracy Theories on 8kun and Gab. Digital Journalism 9 (9): 1321–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1938165.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

How to Cite

Michael Angello Qadosy Riyadi, Aulia, A. B. F., & Fauzi, M. A. N. (2026). Human Rights Enforcement in the Post-Truth Era: Digital Discourse of #IndonesiaHumanRightsSOS on Twitter. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 10(1), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.31571/jpkn.v10i1.10681