Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in higher education: Evidence from student use of AI tools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31571/saintek.v14i2.8716Abstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into higher education has transformed how students approach academic learning and task completion, raising both pedagogical opportunities and ethical concerns. This study investigates patterns of AI use, perceived benefits, and integrity-related challenges among pre-service English teachers in a higher education context. Using a descriptive quantitative design, data were collected from 338 pre-service teachers through a structured online questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics. The findings reveal an exceptionally high level of AI adoption, with 98.2% of respondents reporting regular use of AI tools to support their academic activities, indicating that AI has become embedded in students’ everyday learning routines. However, AI use was found to be predominantly efficiency-oriented, with 44.1% of students using AI primarily for task completion and 40.8% for time efficiency, while only 15.1% reported using AI to explicitly enhance academic quality. Despite this instrumental orientation, students demonstrated substantial ethical awareness, as 72.8% acknowledged that AI has the potential to undermine academic integrity, particularly in relation to honesty and originality. At the same time, AI was perceived to offer meaningful learning-related benefits. A majority of respondents (68.6%) reported improvements in the quality of their academic outputs when using AI, describing their work as more structured, accurate, and polished. Furthermore, 77.5% of students indicated increased confidence in completing academic tasks with AI support, suggesting that AI may function as a form of cognitive and affective scaffolding. Overall, the study highlights the dual role of AI in higher education as both a productivity-enhancing learning support tool and a source of ethical tension. These findings underscore the need for clear institutional guidelines, ethical literacy, and pedagogical strategies that promote responsible, reflective, and learning-oriented use of AI in teacher education.
Downloads
References
Abidin, A. A. (2023). Dampak penggunaan smartphone pada proses pembelajaran. Education: Scientific Journal of Education, 1(2). https://journal.csspublishing.com/index.php/education/article/view/111/65
Afandi, A. R., & Kurnia, H. (2023). Revolusi teknologi: Masa depan kecerdasan buatan (AI) dan dampaknya terhadap masyarakat. Academy of Social Science and Global Citizenship Journal, 3(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.47200/aossagcj.v3i1.1837
Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., & Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
Bilquise, G., & Shaalan, K. (2022). AI-based academic advising framework: A knowledge management perspective. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130823
Bülbül, A. E., & Özelçi, S. Y. (2024). The mediating role of mobile learning motivation in the relationship between pre-service teachers’ digital literacy and pre-service teacher identity. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12868-9
Eaton, S. E., Pethrick, H., & Turner, K. L. (2023). Academic integrity and student mental well-being: A rapid review. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 5(2), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.11575/cpai.v5i2.73748
Falade, A. (2021). Perceptions on the utilization of mobile technologies for learning among postgraduate students. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 5(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.9036
Fauzi, E., Sinatrya, M. V., Ramdhani, N. D., Ramadhan, R., & Safari, Z. M. R. (2022). The influence of advances in information technology on accounting development. Journal of Economic Education Research, 7(2), 189–197.
Finnie-Ansley, P. D. R. (2022). The robots are coming: Exploring the implications of OpenAI Codex on introductory programming. In Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511863
Fuchs, K. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of NLP models in higher education: Is ChatGPT a blessing or a curse? Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1166682. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1166682
Fuchs, K., & Aguilos, V. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence in higher education: Empirical insights from students about using ChatGPT. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(9).
Hill-Yardin, E. L., et al. (2023). A chat (GPT) about the future of scientific publishing. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 110, 152–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.02.022
Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2021). A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615
Jing, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education. In Advances in computer and electrical engineering. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-6937-8.ch014
Koul, A., Bawa, R. K., & Kumar, Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence techniques to predict airway disorders illness: A systematic review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30, 831–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09818-4
Labajová, L. (2023). The state of AI: Exploring the perceptions, credibility, and trustworthiness of users towards AI-generated content (Master’s thesis). Malmö University. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-1772553
Mhlanga, D. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Exploring opportunities for emerging economies to improve education with ChatGPT. University of Johannesburg. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4355758
Miswar, et al. (2023). HMI leadership roadmap. Nas Media Pustaka.
Muritala, N. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ integration of mobile learning technologies for instruction. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 5(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v5i1.46159
Nisa, K., Ramadhan, S., & Thahar, H. E. (2023). Assessing undergraduate students’ perspectives on lecturers’ technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge competency. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 18(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v18i1.8364
Oravec, J. (2022). AI, biometric analysis, and emerging cheating detection systems: The engineering of academic integrity. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30, Article 175. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.30.5765
Nurhalifah, Rizaldi, D. R., Muktopan, & Nilwan. (2024). Dampak positif dan negatif penggunaan smartphone terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Action Research Journal, 1(1), 10–17. https://ejournal.lembagaeinsteincollege.com/ARJ/article/view/22
Pedro, F., et al. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. UNESCO Education Sector. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12799/6533
Pereira, J., & Díaz, Ó. (2022). Struggling to keep tabs on capstone projects: A chatbot to tackle student procrastination. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469127
Popenici, S. A. D., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
Salmi, J., & Setiyanti, A. (2023). Persepsi mahasiswa terhadap penggunaan ChatGPT di era Pendidikan 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(19), 399–406. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8403233
Schaap, H., van der Want, A., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., & Meijer, P. C. (2021). Changes over time in the professional identity tensions of Dutch early-career teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, Article 103283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103283
Schijven, M. P., & Kikkawa, T. (2023). Why is serious gaming important? Let’s have a chat! Simulation & Gaming, 54(2), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231152682
Selwyn, N. (2019). Digital technology and the contemporary university. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768656
Sianipar, A. Z. (2019). Penggunaan Google Form sebagai alat penilaian kepuasan pelayanan mahasiswa. Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 3(1), 16–22. https://journal.stmikjayakarta.ac.id/index.php/jisamar/article/view/72
Siroj, R. A., Afgani, W., Fatimah, F., Septaria, D., & Salsabila, G. Z. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif pendekatan ilmiah untuk analisis data. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(3), 11279–11289. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v7i3.32467
Wang, M., & Yu, L.-J. (2024). Digitalization’s impact on Chinese higher vocational teachers: Identity, satisfaction, resignation. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(4), Article 27356. https://doi.org/10.55267/jisem.07.15438
Pratiwi, W. R. (2023). Pemanfaatan artificial intelligence (AI) dalam dunia pendidikan. PT Radar Makassar Intermedia. https://www.pratiwiwidyarizky.my.id/
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1798995
Wollny, S., et al. (2021). Are we there yet? A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
Yousaf, F., Satti, S. M. J., Khan, Z., & Um-e-Safia. (2025). AI-powered personalized learning: Advancing language education in the digital era. Journal of Social Signs Review, 2(4), 730–740. https://socialsignsreview.com/index.php/12/article/view/71
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., et al. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Irwan, Ardila Venesa, Fatimah Azzahra Rabiah, Febiola Esfandiani Geraldine, Akwilia Setya Mirandea

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains Posting Your Article Policy at http://journal.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/saintek/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
Copyright
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan Informatika dan Sains agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Download: 117
