Integrating Vernacular Architecture into Science Education: Ethnoscience Analysis of Dayak Traditional Houses for Context-Based Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31571/jpsa.v8i2.10911

Keywords:

ethnoscience, Dayak traditional house, vernacular architecture, context-based learning, science education, rumah betang, Kalimantan

Abstract

Ethnoscience-based approaches offer a promising pathway for making science education more culturally relevant and effective in diverse Indonesian school contexts. This paper presents a systematic ethnoscience analysis of Dayak traditional houses (rumah betang) from West and Central Kalimantan and maps the embedded scientific knowledge to Indonesian national science curriculum standards (Kurikulum Merdeka, 2022) for Grades 4–9. Using a qualitative research design combining ethnographic observation, documentary analysis, and curriculum mapping, the study identified 23 distinct scientific concepts across six thematic domains material science, thermal physics, biodiversity and ecology, hydrology, structural mechanics, and sustainability embedded in the design, construction materials, and spatial logic of the rumah betang. Six context-based learning (CBL) scenarios are developed from these findings to provide actionable pedagogical guidance for science teachers in Kalimantan. The paper argues that vernacular architecture constitutes a 'master context' for ethnoscience-based science education: a single, culturally resonant real-world situation capable of anchoring learning across multiple science topics and grade levels. Implications for teacher professional development and curriculum policy in Indonesia are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nurussaniah Nurussaniah, Physics Education Program, Universitas PGRI Pontianak

References

Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077

Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287.

Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186

Berlin, B. (1992). Ethnobiological classification: Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press.

Boutte, G., Kelly-Jackson, C., & Johnson, G. (2010). Culturally relevant practices in science classrooms: Going beyond the surface. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 1021–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9280-0

Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2001). Defining 'science' in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 50–67.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Capaian pembelajaran mata pelajaran IPA SD/SMP. Kemendikbudristek.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

Lim, J. Y. (1987). The Malay house: Rediscovering Malaysia's indigenous shelter system. Institut Masyarakat.

Martawijaya, A., Kartasujana, I., Kadir, K., & Prawira, S. A. (1989). Atlas kayu Indonesia: Jilid II. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.

Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multiscience perspective. Science Education, 79(5), 583–593. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790508

Parmin, P., Sajidan, S., Ashadi, A., Sutikno, S., & Fibriana, F. (2017). Science integrated learning model to enhance the scientific work independence of student teacher in indigenous knowledge. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.9341

Rahayu, S., Mulyani, S., & Miswadi, S. S. (2021). Ethnoscience integration in the Indonesian Merdeka Belajar curriculum: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918, 022003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/2/022003

Sellato, B. (1989). Hornbill and dragon: Arts and culture of Borneo. Elf Aquitaine.

Semken, S., & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20279

Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (2001). Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 6–34.

Sudarmin, S., Febu, R., Nuswowati, M., & Sumarni, W. (2019). Development of ethnoscience approach in the module theme substance additives to improve the cognitive learning outcome and student's entrepreneurship. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321, 022002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022002

Ültanır, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–212.

Waterson, R. (1997). The living house: An anthropology of architecture in South-East Asia. Thames and Hudson.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Nurussaniah, N. (2025). Integrating Vernacular Architecture into Science Education: Ethnoscience Analysis of Dayak Traditional Houses for Context-Based Learning. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN SAINS DAN APLIKASINYA, 8(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.31571/jpsa.v8i2.10911

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.